mskennedy2003
mskennedy2003 mskennedy2003
  • 15-02-2018
  • History
contestada

Do you think judges should be elected or appointed? Explain why or why not.

(What are your Opinions?)

Respuesta :

TheTheyLoveKeke
TheTheyLoveKeke TheTheyLoveKeke
  • 15-02-2018
I believe that judges should not be elected. If we were elected, it could prove to be more difficult to remain completely unbiased. If we were elected by the people, their arguments and opinions could influence decisions. Therefore, by being appointed by the president, judges can remain unbiased and completely fair, which will produce the best outcomes in the court of law. 
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

What was the relationship between the temperance and suffrage movement
Which causes malaria, African sleeping sickness, and amoebic dysentery?A. FungiB. VirusesC. BacteriaD. Protists
how will you describe the pathway of the oxygen n the breathing system?
what is the cuberoot of the squareroot of 324?
Electrons surround the nucleus of an atom and those that are in the outer energy levels are _____.less attracted to the nucleusmore attracted to the nucleusnot
Electrons surround the nucleus of an atom and those that are in the outer energy levels are _____.less attracted to the nucleusmore attracted to the nucleusnot
Electrons surround the nucleus of an atom and those that are in the outer energy levels are _____.less attracted to the nucleusmore attracted to the nucleusnot
what does it mean to 'have a go'?
give some facts on Sputnik
In the election of 1860, the _______ won the electoral votes of all the free states, except a fraction of the New Jersey votes